Insurance Reimbursement

We have found that about sixty percent of insurance companies that cover psychiatric services reimburse our customers for the purchase of an Apollo light box (Non-UV Phototherapy Boxes).

Some insurance companies are unfamiliar with the diagnosis of Seasonal Affective Disorder and light therapy. For non-UV light therapy to be considered for coverage by your insurance company it is important that you provide them with the following:

1) a prescription,

2) a letter from your physician explaining the diagnosis of SAD
and its treatment throught lignt therapy,

3) copies of published research supporting the therapy.
Link to
Some Published Research

Below is an example of a letter that might be sent.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

To whom it may concern,

This is to certify that_________________________________________________has been a patient of mine since________, 20______. I have treated him/her for recurrent major depressions (DSM-IV 296.3), with a seasonal pattern. This condition, also known as Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD), has heen shown in many studies in the United States and elsewhere in the world to respond to treatment with bright environmental light (light therapy). Light therapy is no longer considered experimental, but is a mainstream type of psychiatric treatment, described in the Task Force Report of the American Psychiatric Association: Treatment of Psychiatric Disdorders, Vol. 3, pages 1890-1896, APA Press, 1989. Inorder to administer light therapy adequately, a quality light box such as the Apollo Brite Lite IV, is required. (see attached invoice).

Although a light box is an expensive piece of equipment, the experience of clinicians who have used it for many patients indicates that it saves a great deal of money in the long run, by reducing the number of doctors' visits and laboratory investigations of persistent symptoms, as well as the indirect costs of lost productivity. I contend in ______________________________'s case the use of the Brite Lite IV should be regarded not only as a medical necessity, to be used in preference to (or in addition to) other forms of treatment, but also as a means of reducing his/her overall medical costs.